ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
PipFarm vs FundedX: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between PipFarm and FundedX face a decision between two fundamentally different approaches to prop trading challenges. PipFarm offers a more forgiving time structure with 90 days to pass Phase 1 and higher drawdown limits at 6%, while FundedX demands quick execution with only 7 days but provides a lower entry cost at $489 versus PipFarm's $750. This comparison examines their challenge structures, risk parameters, and profit-sharing models to help you determine which firm aligns with your trading style and risk tolerance.
P
PipFarm
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.3
1,000 reviews
VS
3 wins
2 ties
6 wins
F
FundedX
Est. 2024 · N/A
4
200 reviews
Feature
PipFarm
FundedX
Challenge Price ($100K)
$750
$489✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
N/A
5%
Max Daily Loss
2%
3%✓ More daily loss room
Max Total Loss
6%✓ More drawdown room
4%
Time Limit (Phase 1)
90 days✓ More time to pass
7 days
Payout Split
99%
80% (up to 100%)✓ Higher profit split
Payout Frequency
7 days
bi-weekly✓ Faster payouts
Platforms
cTrader
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker✓ More platform options
PipFarm
Pros
+Highest profit share in the industry at up to 99%
+Multiple challenge modes (Classic, Endurance, Consistency) to suit different trading styles
+Fast scaling program up to $1.5M maximum allocation
+Flexible payout intervals with weekly option available
+Experience points system with increasing benefits and profit share up to 99%
Cons
−Relatively new firm founded in 2023 with limited track record
−Limited to cTrader platform only
−Complex rule structure with multiple modes may be confusing for beginners
−90-day time limit resets after each payout adding pressure
−Many features require additional fees as add-ons
FundedX
Pros
+Multiple challenge types including 7-day Turbo with 100% profit split
+Instant funding options available with immediate capital access
+Copy trading allowed in Turbo challenges
+24/7 customer support available
+Large account sizes available up to $10 million
Cons
−Weekend holding not allowed which limits trading flexibility
−No tick scalping or rapid re-entry permitted
−No stacking allowed (limit of 3+ trades)
−Relatively new firm founded in 2024 with limited track record
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
FundedX suits aggressive scalpers and experienced traders who can capitalize on tight timeframes and don't mind lower total drawdown limits. The 7-day Phase 1 challenge and 3% daily loss room favor high-frequency strategies, while the $489 entry cost reduces barrier to entry by over $250 compared to PipFarm.
PipFarm works better for swing traders and those who need time to develop their edge, offering 90 days in Phase 1 and 6% total drawdown versus FundedX's restrictive 4%. The 99% profit split also beats FundedX's tiered structure for consistent profitable traders. For most retail traders, PipFarm's extended timeframe and higher drawdown tolerance provide a more realistic path to funding, despite the higher upfront cost.
Choose PipFarm if:
→Highest profit share in the industry at up to 99%
→Multiple challenge modes (Classic, Endurance, Consistency) to suit different trading styles
→Fast scaling program up to $1.5M maximum allocation
→Flexible payout intervals with weekly option available
Choose FundedX if:
→Multiple challenge types including 7-day Turbo with 100% profit split
→Instant funding options available with immediate capital access
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.