ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
Lux Trading Firm vs AquaFunded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between Lux Trading Firm and AquaFunded face a decision between structured simplicity and trading freedom. Lux Trading Firm offers a single-phase evaluation with no daily loss limits, while AquaFunded provides more drawdown room and allows news trading with EA/bot strategies. This comparison examines their challenge structures, trading rules, payout terms, and track records to help you determine which firm aligns with your trading style and risk management approach.
LT
Lux Trading Firm
Est. 2021 · London, UK
4
1,000 reviews
VS
4 wins
3 ties
7 wins
A
AquaFunded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.3
200 reviews
Feature
Lux Trading Firm
AquaFunded
Challenge Price ($100K)
$260✓ Lower entry cost
$283
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation
5%
Max Daily Loss
No limit✓ No daily loss limit
5%
Max Total Loss
6%
10%✓ More drawdown room
Min Trading Days
0 days
None✓ No minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
80%
90% (up to 100%)✓ Higher profit split
Lux Trading Firm
Pros
+Offers the largest account sizes in the industry up to $10,000,000
+1-stage evaluation process with instant funding available
+100% evaluation fee refund after passing first stage
+Instant withdrawals with no fixed payout cycles
+Real A-book execution with direct liquidity provider partnership
Cons
−Complex risk consistency rules requiring fixed percentage allocation per trade
−High-frequency trading and automated EAs strictly prohibited
−Single trade profit limited to 5% of profit target per stage
−Higher evaluation fees compared to many competitors
−Static 6% drawdown limit that doesn't move with account growth
AquaFunded
Pros
+Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
+Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
+No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
+Reward guarantee with 24-hour payout or $1000 compensation
Cons
−Relatively new firm (founded 2023) with limited track record
−Lower Trustpilot review count compared to established competitors
−Some account sizes show higher daily loss limits (5%) vs 3% standard
−Instant funding requires higher fees than challenge models
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
AquaFunded suits aggressive traders who need flexibility in their approach. With 10% total drawdown versus Lux's 6%, news trading allowed, and EA/bot support, it accommodates high-frequency strategies and algorithmic trading. The 90-100% payout split also rewards successful traders more generously than Lux's 80% rate.
Lux Trading Firm works better for conservative traders who prefer structure and lower costs. The $260 challenge price saves $23 upfront, and the single-phase evaluation means no secondary profit target to hit. The absence of daily loss limits suits swing traders who can handle larger single-day drawdowns within their overall risk parameters.
For most traders, AquaFunded offers better value despite the higher entry cost. The combination of 4% more drawdown room, unrestricted news trading, and significantly higher profit splits outweighs Lux's cost advantage and simplified evaluation process.
Choose Lux Trading Firm if:
→Offers the largest account sizes in the industry up to $10,000,000
→1-stage evaluation process with instant funding available
→100% evaluation fee refund after passing first stage
→Instant withdrawals with no fixed payout cycles
Choose AquaFunded if:
→Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
→Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
→No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.