ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
FTMO vs Moneta Funded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between FTMO and Moneta Funded face a decision between an established industry leader and a newer firm with more flexible rules. FTMO offers the reliability of a 9-year track record and proven bi-weekly payouts, while Moneta Funded eliminates key restrictions like daily loss limits and time constraints that trip up many traders. The comparison reveals fundamentally different approaches to prop trading - FTMO's structured two-phase system versus Moneta Funded's single-phase evaluation. Understanding these differences is crucial since each firm serves distinct trading styles and experience levels.
F
FTMO
Est. 2015 · Prague, Czech Republic
4.8
40,000 reviews
VS
6 wins
4 ties
4 wins
MF
Moneta Funded
Est. 2024 · N/A
4
200 reviews
Feature
FTMO
Moneta Funded
Challenge Price ($100K)
$540
N/A
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
N/A
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation
Max Daily Loss
5%
No limit✓ No daily loss limit
Max Total Loss
10%
N/A
Min Trading Days
4 days
None✓ No minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
30 days
No limit✓ No time limit
Payout Split
80% (up to 90%)
N/A
FTMO
Pros
+Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
+Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
+Strong payout track record — $500M+ total paid to traders
+Performance coaching and FTMO Academy included
Cons
−News trading restricted (2 min buffer around major events)
−Higher challenge prices than most competitors at same account sizes
−Scaling plan slower than rivals (25% increase every 4 months)
−Maximum initial allocation capped at $200K before scaling
Moneta Funded
Pros
+Backed by global brokerage Moneta Markets providing established trading infrastructure
+Offers educational resources to help traders pass challenges and get funded
+Focuses on performance-based earning opportunities for successful traders
Cons
−Limited information available about specific trading rules and conditions
−Relatively new firm established in 2024 with less proven track record
−Website lacks detailed transparency about account sizes and pricing
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
FTMO suits disciplined traders who can work within structured parameters and value proven reliability. With 4.8/5 stars from 40,000 reviews and consistent bi-weekly payouts since 2015, it's the safer choice for traders who don't mind the 5% daily loss limit and 30-day time constraints. News traders should note FTMO's trading restrictions during high-impact events.
Moneta Funded better serves aggressive traders and scalpers who need maximum flexibility. The absence of daily loss limits, time constraints, and minimum trading days makes it ideal for traders whose strategies don't fit traditional prop firm boxes. However, with only 200 reviews and founding in 2024, it carries higher uncertainty around long-term stability and payout reliability.
For most traders, FTMO remains the recommended choice due to its proven track record and reliable payout system. Only choose Moneta Funded if FTMO's daily loss limits or time restrictions have previously caused you to fail evaluations, and you're comfortable with the risks of a newer firm.
Choose FTMO if:
→Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
→Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.