ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
FTMO vs FundedX: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between FTMO and FundedX face a fundamental tradeoff between proven stability and aggressive new terms. FTMO offers the deep track record of a 9-year-old firm with 40,000 Trustpilot reviews, but requires hitting 10% profit targets across two phases. FundedX counters with a single-phase 5% target that's easier to pass, though with tighter risk limits and minimal trading history since launching in 2024. This comparison examines how their challenge structures, risk rules, and firm credentials stack up for different trading styles.
F
FTMO
Est. 2015 · Prague, Czech Republic
4.8
40,000 reviews
VS
7 wins
2 ties
5 wins
F
FundedX
Est. 2024 · N/A
4
200 reviews
Feature
FTMO
FundedX
Challenge Price ($100K)
$540
$489✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
5%✓ Easier to pass
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation
Max Daily Loss
5%✓ More daily loss room
3%
Max Total Loss
10%✓ More drawdown room
4%
Min Trading Days
4 days
None✓ No minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
30 days✓ More time to pass
7 days
Payout Split
80% (up to 90%)
80% (up to 100%)✓ Higher profit split
FTMO
Pros
+Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
+Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
+Strong payout track record — $500M+ total paid to traders
+Performance coaching and FTMO Academy included
Cons
−News trading restricted (2 min buffer around major events)
−Higher challenge prices than most competitors at same account sizes
−Scaling plan slower than rivals (25% increase every 4 months)
−Maximum initial allocation capped at $200K before scaling
FundedX
Pros
+Multiple challenge types including 7-day Turbo with 100% profit split
+Instant funding options available with immediate capital access
+Copy trading allowed in Turbo challenges
+24/7 customer support available
+Large account sizes available up to $10 million
Cons
−Weekend holding not allowed which limits trading flexibility
−No tick scalping or rapid re-entry permitted
−No stacking allowed (limit of 3+ trades)
−Relatively new firm founded in 2024 with limited track record
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
FTMO suits experienced traders who prioritize firm stability and need generous risk limits for their strategies. With 5% daily loss and 10% total drawdown allowances, FTMO accommodates swing traders and those running multiple positions, while its 4.8/5 rating from 40,000+ reviews provides confidence in long-term reliability. The two-phase structure, though harder to pass, has proven sustainable for thousands of funded traders since 2015.
FundedX appeals to newer traders or those struggling with FTMO's profit targets, offering a dramatically easier path to funding with just 5% profit required in a single phase. However, the 3% daily loss and 4% total drawdown limits restrict this firm to conservative scalpers and day traders who close positions quickly. Given FundedX's 2024 launch date and limited review history, it's better suited for traders willing to accept higher firm risk in exchange for easier qualification terms.
For most traders, FTMO remains the safer choice despite higher profit targets. The combination of established operations, generous risk parameters, and proven payout history outweighs FundedX's easier entry requirements, especially when the difference in challenge cost is only $51 for the $100K account.
Choose FTMO if:
→Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
→Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.