ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
FTMO vs For Traders: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Choosing between FTMO and For Traders comes down to whether you prioritize proven reliability or flexible evaluation terms. FTMO offers higher profit splits and an 8-year track record, while For Traders removes time limits and charges $141 less for their $100K challenge. This comparison breaks down the key differences in pricing, challenge rules, payouts, and trading restrictions to help you decide which firm aligns with your trading style and risk tolerance.
F
FTMO
Est. 2015 · Prague, Czech Republic
4.8
40,000 reviews
VS
7 wins
4 ties
3 wins
FT
For Traders
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.5
1,000 reviews
Feature
FTMO
For Traders
Challenge Price ($100K)
$540
$399✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%✓ Easier to pass
7%
Max Daily Loss
5%
5%
Max Total Loss
10%
10%
Min Trading Days
4 days
3 days✓ More flexible
Time Limit (Phase 1)
30 days
No limit✓ No time limit
Payout Split
80% (up to 90%)✓ Higher starting split
70% (up to 90%)
FTMO
Pros
+Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
+Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
+Strong payout track record — $500M+ total paid to traders
+Performance coaching and FTMO Academy included
Cons
−News trading restricted (2 min buffer around major events)
−Higher challenge prices than most competitors at same account sizes
−Scaling plan slower than rivals (25% increase every 4 months)
−Maximum initial allocation capped at $200K before scaling
For Traders
Pros
+48-hour reward guarantee with 100% profit split if delayed
+AI-powered coaching to help traders pass evaluations
+Multi-asset trading including crypto with weekend trading
+Customizable challenge rules based on trading strategy
+Raw spreads with low $2 per lot commissions
Cons
−Relatively new firm established in 2023
−Limited account size options compared to competitors
−News trading restricted to challenge phase only
−Maximum virtual capital allocation requires premium program qualification
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
For Traders suits traders who struggle with time pressure or prefer flexible evaluation conditions. The unlimited Phase 1 timeframe and lower entry cost ($399 vs $540) make it appealing for newer traders or those who need more time to develop strategies. However, the higher Phase 2 profit target (7% vs 5%) and lower starting payout split (70% vs 80%) offset some of these advantages.
FTMO is the better choice for experienced traders who can meet stricter deadlines and want maximum profitability. The 5% Phase 2 target is significantly easier than For Traders' 7%, and the 80% starting payout split means more money in your pocket from day one. With 4.8/5 stars from 40,000 Trustpilot reviews versus For Traders' 1,000 reviews, FTMO also offers greater long-term security.
Bottom line: Choose FTMO if you're confident in your trading skills and want proven reliability with better profit terms. Choose For Traders only if you specifically need the unlimited time limit and can accept lower payouts for that flexibility.
Choose FTMO if:
→Most established and trusted brand in prop trading (est. 2015)
→Free retry policy if profit target met but other rule breached
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.