ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
For Traders vs Hantec Trader: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between For Traders and Hantec Trader face a decision between two similarly rated firms with different cost structures and payout approaches. Hantec Trader offers a cheaper entry point at $359 for their $100K challenge versus For Traders' $399, but For Traders counters with bi-weekly payouts and more platform options including cTrader and TradeLocker. Both firms launched in 2023 and maintain identical 4.5/5 Trustpilot ratings, though For Traders has double the review volume. This comparison examines their challenge terms, payout structures, and trading conditions to determine which firm better serves different trading styles.
FT
For Traders
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.5
1,000 reviews
VS
3 wins
6 ties
3 wins
HT
Hantec Trader
Est. 2023 · London, UK
4.5
500 reviews
Feature
For Traders
Hantec Trader
Challenge Price ($100K)
$399
$359✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
7%
5%✓ Easier to pass
Max Daily Loss
5%
5%
Max Total Loss
10%
10%
Min Trading Days
3 days
3 days
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
70% (up to 90%)
80% (up to 90%)✓ Higher starting split
For Traders
Pros
+48-hour reward guarantee with 100% profit split if delayed
+AI-powered coaching to help traders pass evaluations
+Multi-asset trading including crypto with weekend trading
+Customizable challenge rules based on trading strategy
+Raw spreads with low $2 per lot commissions
Cons
−Relatively new firm established in 2023
−Limited account size options compared to competitors
−News trading restricted to challenge phase only
−Maximum virtual capital allocation requires premium program qualification
Hantec Trader
Pros
+Multiple program types available including instant funding with no challenge
+No time limits on Enhanced and EnhancedX challenge phases
+Competitive challenge prices starting at $59 for $10K accounts
+Up to 90% profit split available with add-ons
+Official UFC partner in APAC region
Cons
−Limited leverage capped at 1:50 across all instruments
−Maximum account size limited to $200K
−Instant funding program has high entry costs relative to account size
−EnhancedX program requires consistency score tracking
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
For Traders suits traders who prioritize fast payouts and platform flexibility, particularly those using cTrader or TradeLocker who want their profits every two weeks. The firm's broader platform selection makes it ideal for traders with specific execution preferences or those running EAs optimized for particular platforms.
Hantec Trader better serves cost-conscious traders and those who prefer higher immediate profit splits over faster payouts. The $40 lower challenge cost and 80% starting payout split (versus 70% at For Traders) means more money in your pocket from day one. The easier 5% Phase 2 target also gives traders a better chance of reaching funded status.
Choose Hantec Trader if you want lower upfront costs and higher starting payouts, or For Traders if you need bi-weekly payouts and advanced platform options. For most traders focused on profitability over speed, Hantec Trader's combination of lower entry cost and higher initial payout split provides better value.
Choose For Traders if:
→48-hour reward guarantee with 100% profit split if delayed
→AI-powered coaching to help traders pass evaluations
→Multi-asset trading including crypto with weekend trading
→Customizable challenge rules based on trading strategy
Choose Hantec Trader if:
→Multiple program types available including instant funding with no challenge
→No time limits on Enhanced and EnhancedX challenge phases
→Competitive challenge prices starting at $59 for $10K accounts
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.