ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
For Traders vs AquaFunded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Choosing between For Traders and AquaFunded comes down to whether you prioritize reputation or economics. AquaFunded offers significantly better financial terms with a $283 challenge cost versus For Traders' $399, plus a 90-100% profit split compared to For Traders' 70-90%. However, For Traders brings more market credibility with 1,000 Trustpilot reviews and a higher 4.5/5 rating versus AquaFunded's 200 reviews at 4.3/5. This comparison examines the trading rules, costs, and practical differences that matter for your bottom line.
FT
For Traders
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.5
1,000 reviews
VS
0 wins
5 ties
9 wins
A
AquaFunded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.3
200 reviews
Feature
For Traders
AquaFunded
Challenge Price ($100K)
$399
$283✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
7%
5%✓ Easier to pass
Max Daily Loss
5%
5%
Max Total Loss
10%
10%
Min Trading Days
3 days
None✓ No minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
70% (up to 90%)
90% (up to 100%)✓ Higher profit split
For Traders
Pros
+48-hour reward guarantee with 100% profit split if delayed
+AI-powered coaching to help traders pass evaluations
+Multi-asset trading including crypto with weekend trading
+Customizable challenge rules based on trading strategy
+Raw spreads with low $2 per lot commissions
Cons
−Relatively new firm established in 2023
−Limited account size options compared to competitors
−News trading restricted to challenge phase only
−Maximum virtual capital allocation requires premium program qualification
AquaFunded
Pros
+Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
+Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
+No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
+Reward guarantee with 24-hour payout or $1000 compensation
Cons
−Relatively new firm (founded 2023) with limited track record
−Lower Trustpilot review count compared to established competitors
−Some account sizes show higher daily loss limits (5%) vs 3% standard
−Instant funding requires higher fees than challenge models
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
AquaFunded is the clear winner for traders prioritizing economics and flexibility. The $116 lower challenge cost, 90-100% profit split, no minimum trading days, and unrestricted news trading make it superior for active traders and scalpers. The 5% Phase 2 profit target versus 7% at For Traders also makes it easier to reach funded status.
For Traders only makes sense if you heavily weight reputation over economics. With 5x more Trustpilot reviews and a slightly higher rating, it offers more social proof but significantly worse terms. Given both firms launched in 2023 with no major trust differentiators, paying $116 extra for marginally better reviews doesn't justify the cost.
Choose AquaFunded unless you're willing to pay a premium for reputation. The financial advantages are too substantial to ignore for a rational trader.
Choose For Traders if:
→48-hour reward guarantee with 100% profit split if delayed
→AI-powered coaching to help traders pass evaluations
→Multi-asset trading including crypto with weekend trading
→Customizable challenge rules based on trading strategy
Choose AquaFunded if:
→Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
→Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
→No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.