ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
BrightFunded vs AquaFunded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between BrightFunded and AquaFunded face a classic trade-off between entry cost and challenge difficulty. AquaFunded cuts the $100K challenge price nearly in half at $283 versus BrightFunded's $558, but requires a steeper 10% Phase 1 profit target compared to BrightFunded's more achievable 8%. Both firms launched in 2023 and offer solid reputations, but differ significantly in their approaches to minimum trading requirements, payout schedules, and platform options. This comparison examines their key rules, costs, and trader experience to help you pick the right fit.
B
BrightFunded
Est. 2023 · Dubai, United Arab Emirates
4.4
1,500 reviews
VS
2 wins
5 ties
7 wins
A
AquaFunded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.3
200 reviews
Feature
BrightFunded
AquaFunded
Challenge Price ($100K)
$558
$283✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
8%✓ Easier to pass
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
5%
Max Daily Loss
5%
5%
Max Total Loss
10%
10%
Min Trading Days
5 days
None✓ No minimum
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
N/A
90% (up to 100%)
BrightFunded
Pros
+15% evaluation profit reward on all evaluation phase profits
+Lightning-fast payouts guaranteed within 24 hours
+Reward guarantee with 24-hour payout or $1000 compensation
Cons
−Relatively new firm (founded 2023) with limited track record
−Lower Trustpilot review count compared to established competitors
−Some account sizes show higher daily loss limits (5%) vs 3% standard
−Instant funding requires higher fees than challenge models
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
BrightFunded suits conservative traders who prefer higher success odds over lower entry costs. The 8% Phase 1 target versus AquaFunded's 10% makes a meaningful difference in pass rates, and weekly payouts versus bi-weekly keep cash flow consistent. With 1,500 Trustpilot reviews versus 200, BrightFunded also offers more established credibility despite both firms being founded in 2023.
AquaFunded works better for budget-conscious traders and those who need maximum flexibility. At $283 for the $100K challenge versus $558, it's almost half the upfront cost, and the lack of minimum trading days lets you pass challenges faster if you're skilled. The platform variety and allowance for news trading and EAs also gives active traders more strategic options.
For most traders, BrightFunded's easier profit targets outweigh AquaFunded's cost savings. An 8% versus 10% target significantly improves your odds of earning back that higher entry fee, making BrightFunded the smarter long-term investment despite the steeper upfront cost.
Choose BrightFunded if:
→15% evaluation profit reward on all evaluation phase profits
→Lightning-fast payouts guaranteed within 24 hours
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.