ℹ️This page may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
Updated 2026-03-08
Blueberry Funded vs AquaFunded: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Choosing between Blueberry Funded and AquaFunded comes down to whether you prioritize evaluation simplicity or operational flexibility. Blueberry Funded offers a single-phase evaluation with no daily loss limits, while AquaFunded provides multiple trading platforms and bi-weekly payouts but imposes a 5% daily loss restriction. Both firms launched in 2023 with identical 4.3/5 Trustpilot ratings, making their structural differences the key deciding factors. This comparison examines their evaluation phases, risk management rules, platform options, and payout structures to help you determine which aligns with your trading style.
BF
Blueberry Funded
Est. 2023 · Australia
4.3
500 reviews
VS
2 wins
5 ties
6 wins
A
AquaFunded
Est. 2023 · N/A
4.3
200 reviews
Feature
Blueberry Funded
AquaFunded
Challenge Price ($100K)
N/A
$283
Phase 1 Profit Target
N/A
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation
5%
Max Daily Loss
No limit✓ No daily loss limit
5%
Max Total Loss
N/A
10%
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
N/A
90% (up to 100%)
Payout Frequency
N/A
bi-weekly✓ Faster payouts
Blueberry Funded
Pros
+No time limit on trading evaluations
+Broker-backed firm providing industry leading platforms
+Simulated capital up to $2,000,000 available
+Instant funding option available to skip evaluation
+Scaling plan allows 25% balance increase every 3 months with up to 90% profit split
Cons
−Newer firm established in 2023 with limited track record
−Specific trading rules and restrictions not clearly detailed on main pages
−Account pricing and challenge costs not disclosed on homepage
AquaFunded
Pros
+Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
+Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
+No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
+Reward guarantee with 24-hour payout or $1000 compensation
Cons
−Relatively new firm (founded 2023) with limited track record
−Lower Trustpilot review count compared to established competitors
−Some account sizes show higher daily loss limits (5%) vs 3% standard
−Instant funding requires higher fees than challenge models
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
AquaFunded suits active traders who value platform variety and consistent payouts. With MT5, MatchTrade, TradeLocker, and cTrader support plus bi-weekly withdrawals, it caters to news traders and EA users who need operational flexibility. The 10% Phase 1 target and 5% Phase 2 target provide clear progression milestones, though the 5% daily loss limit requires disciplined risk management.
Blueberry Funded appeals to traders who prefer streamlined evaluations without daily restrictions. The single-phase structure eliminates the complexity of multi-stage challenges, and the absence of daily loss limits suits swing traders or those using wider stop-losses. However, the lack of specified platform options and payout schedules creates uncertainty about operational details.
For most traders, AquaFunded offers better value despite stricter daily limits. The $283 challenge cost, 90-100% profit splits, and multiple platform options provide more concrete benefits than Blueberry Funded's simplified structure with undefined terms.
Choose Blueberry Funded if:
→No time limit on trading evaluations
→Broker-backed firm providing industry leading platforms
→Simulated capital up to $2,000,000 available
→Instant funding option available to skip evaluation
Choose AquaFunded if:
→Instant funding option available to skip evaluation challenges
→Up to 100% profit split with payout on demand
→No time limits on challenges — trade at your own pace
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.