Funded Trading Plus vs Blue Guardian: Which Prop Firm Is Better?
Traders choosing between Funded Trading Plus and Blue Guardian face a decision between established flexibility versus newer simplicity. Funded Trading Plus offers significantly more drawdown room (10% total vs 6%) and higher profit splits reaching 100%, while Blue Guardian counters with a single-phase evaluation and lower entry costs. This comparison examines their challenge structures, risk parameters, and payout terms to help you determine which firm better matches your trading style and risk tolerance.
FT
Funded Trading Plus
Est. 2021 · London, UK
4.7
3,000 reviews
VS
6 wins
4 ties
3 wins
BG
Blue Guardian
Est. 2022 · N/A
4.3
1,500 reviews
Feature
Funded Trading Plus
Blue Guardian
Challenge Price ($100K)
$549
$506✓ Lower entry cost
Phase 1 Profit Target
10%
10%
Phase 2 Profit Target
5%
None (single-phase)✓ Single-phase evaluation
Max Daily Loss
5%✓ More daily loss room
3%
Max Total Loss
10%✓ More drawdown room
6%
Time Limit (Phase 1)
No limit
No limit
Payout Split
80% (up to 100%)✓ Higher profit split
80% (up to 90%)
Payout Frequency
weekly✓ Faster payouts
instant
Funded Trading Plus
Pros
+Multiple challenge types: Instant Funding, 1-Step, and 2-Step options
+Fast weekly reward frequency starting from day 0
+No monthly fees with transparent pricing structure
+News trading allowed and weekend holding permitted
+Swap-free accounts available with no virtual charges for overnight positions
Cons
−Lower leverage at 1:30 compared to many competitors
−Limited account size options shown with pricing
−Add-on features require additional 15% fees each
−Relatively new firm established in 2021
Blue Guardian
Pros
+Instant funding accounts available - skip evaluation phases entirely
+Scale up to $4M in funding capacity
+Instant payouts and 24-hour payout guarantee available
+Multiple account types including 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step challenges
+100% refundable fees after fourth payout
Cons
−Relatively new firm established in 2022
−Lower leverage ratios compared to some competitors (1:30 max for most instruments)
−Limited transparency on company background and headquarters location
−Higher fees for larger account sizes compared to some established competitors
Our Verdict
Which Should You Choose?
Funded Trading Plus suits active traders who need breathing room and maximum profit potential. With 5% daily loss limits versus Blue Guardian's restrictive 3%, plus 10% total drawdown compared to just 6%, it's built for traders who take larger position sizes or hold through volatility. The profit split reaching 100% versus Blue Guardian's 90% cap makes it the clear choice for profitable traders focused on long-term earnings.
Blue Guardian works better for conservative traders who prefer streamlined processes. The single-phase evaluation eliminates the stress of managing a second profit target, and the $43 lower entry cost appeals to budget-conscious traders. However, the tight 3% daily loss limit makes it unsuitable for anything beyond small position scalping.
For most traders, Funded Trading Plus is the superior choice. The additional drawdown room and higher profit potential outweigh Blue Guardian's modest cost savings, especially given Funded Trading Plus's stronger 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating from twice as many reviews.
Choose Funded Trading Plus if:
→Multiple challenge types: Instant Funding, 1-Step, and 2-Step options
→Fast weekly reward frequency starting from day 0
→No monthly fees with transparent pricing structure
→News trading allowed and weekend holding permitted
Choose Blue Guardian if:
→Instant funding accounts available - skip evaluation phases entirely
→Scale up to $4M in funding capacity
→Instant payouts and 24-hour payout guarantee available
→Multiple account types including 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step challenges
Disclaimer:This comparison is for informational purposes only. Prop firm rules change regularly — always verify current terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge. This is not financial advice. Updated 2026-03-08.